The Tully Monster: is that this the world’s most mysterious fossil?

The Tully Monster Thriller

The Tully Monster is a mysterious 307myr-old marine animal recognized solely from the well-known Mazon Creek fossil locality in Illinois. Its physique plan is not like some other animal that has ever lived, and it has been topic to wildly completely different interpretations as to its identification since its discovery in 1955. Final 12 months, Victoria McCoy of Yale College and colleagues recognized it as a lamprey, a primitive sort of fish, however this has since been challenged by a workforce of vertebrate palaeontologists.

02. Reconstruction
Fig. 1. Reconstruction of a Tully monster based mostly on the analysis of McCoy and colleagues. The claw and proboscis are on the precise and its eyebar and eyes, gills and tail fin are additional again. (Sean McMahon/Yale College.)

Fossil collector Francis Tully knew he had made a unprecedented discovery. Inside a rounded nodule was a weird, foot-long animal with a protracted trunk and claw. However he might by no means have recognized fairly how extraordinary his 307myr-old fossil would grow to be. Sixty two years later, scientists are nonetheless arguing over the fundamentals as to what kind of creature it actually was.

What makes it even stranger is that that is no rarity recognized solely from fragmentary stays. After Tully made his discover, phrase received round amongst collectors and, earlier than lengthy, lots of extra had been discovered. Tullimonstrum gregarium, or ‘Tully’s frequent monster’, is now recognized from properly over a thousand fossils, together with many full specimens. “We’ve received 4 cupboards of Tully monsters right here, every of which has 25 drawers,” says Paul Mayer of the Area Museum in Chicago, the place the most important assortment is held.

Widespread, well-preserved and full fossils ought to be the very best to determine. So why has this one remained so enigmatic? And the way did it purchase such notoriety that the MailOnLine lately steered it was the ‘weirdest animal that ever lived’?

Tully, a pipe-fitter by commerce, found the fossil in a pile of nodules discarded from a coal mine within the Mazon Creek space of Illinois. “Sooner or later in the summertime of 1955 I discovered two rocks that had cracked open as a consequence of pure weathering. They held one thing utterly completely different. I knew immediately, I’d by no means seen something prefer it. Not one of the books had it. I’d by no means seen it in museums or at rock golf equipment. So I introduced it to Chicago to the Area Museum to see if they may work out what the satan it was,” mentioned Tully in an interview with the Chicago Tribune in 1987.

Untitled
Fig. 2. Tully monster fossil in an ironstone nodule. Its head is on the precise and its tail is on the left. Precise life-size. (Thomas Clements/Burpee Museum of Pure Historical past.)

Weathering had break up the nodule to disclose a creature with an elongated squid-like physique and tail fin that was fronted by a protracted skinny snout with a toothed claw on the finish. Extensively spaced eyes projected from a pole-like construction that caught out on both facet of its physique. This physique plan is completely different from some other creature that has ever lived.

Tully confirmed his fossil to Eugene Richardson, the curator of fossil invertebrates on the Area Museum, who was additionally baffled by the discover. Fossil-rich ironstone nodules have been present in shale beds that lay on prime of coal deposits. Miners would transfer the shale and nodules apart to get on the coal which allowed collectors to scour the spoil heaps for fossils. Earlier than lengthy, lots of extra specimens had come to Richardson’s consideration, however he was nonetheless none the wiser as to what it was.

Fig. 2
Fig. three. Tully monster photographed in polarized mild. On the prime, its proboscis has folded again over its physique, whereas the darkish spot projecting out is considered one of its eyes. Muscle blocks run alongside its physique (as recognized by McCoy and challenged by Sallan), whereas its tail fin is on the backside. That is the ‘holotype’ specimen used when the species was first described. (Nicole Karpus/Area Museum.)
Fig. 3.
Fig. four. Tully monster in polarized mild. This one is folded in two, with its claw mendacity over the tip of the tail on the backside. Its eyebar and eyes are on the left, whereas the tail fin spreads out backside proper. Scale bar in inches. (Paul Mayer/Area Museum.)

Measuring between 8cm and 40cm lengthy, the Tully monster has solely ever been discovered at websites across the Mazon Creek, a tributary of the Illinois River, in north-eastern Illinois. The Mazon Creek is world well-known for its considerable fossils of soft-bodied animals, which aren’t usually preserved. The positioning gives palaeontologists with essentially the most full snapshot recognized of the creatures that lived in the course of the Carboniferous interval of 359 to 299mya.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 5. Partial Tully monster, with its proboscis folded over. Its eyes undertaking out on an eyebar on the prime. The claw shouldn’t be seen on this specimen. Yellow scale bar equals 1cm. (Paul Mayer/Area Museum.)
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6. Partial Tully monster exhibiting striping that could be muscle segments. The eyes and eyebar are seen on the prime. (Paul Mayer/Area Museum.)

The Tully monster lived in a big estuary alongside jellyfish, sea anemones, all kinds of marine worms, various kinds of mollusc, shrimps, horseshoe crabs and different arthropods, in addition to a number of sorts of fish – lungfish, ray-finned and spiny-jawed fishes, coelacanths and sharks. Leaves and branches of land vegetation have been additionally washed by an incredible river into the estuary, the place it flowed right into a shallow sea.

Heteropod Mollusk
Fig. 7. This free-swimming sea snail, a kind of heteropod mollusc generally known as Pterotrachea, arguably appears extra like a Tully monster than some other residing animal. Palaeontologist Merrill Foster proposed in 1979 that the Tully monster was an odd sort of sea snail comparable with, however indirectly associated to, the heteropods. Some scientists nonetheless imagine this to be the case. On this photograph, its black eyes are above its proboscis and mouth on the precise. Its rounded swimming fin hangs down centre-left and its inner organs are seen. (Dante Fenolio/Science Photograph Library.)

On land, swampy tropical forests dominated by large clubmoss bushes, seed ferns, horsetails and true ferns have been house to amphibians and a wealthy number of bugs and different arthropods. Waterlogged soil in these forests created low oxygen situations that inhibited the decay of  useless bushes and vegetation,  which finally resulted within the coal seams that have been mined in trendy instances. The local weather was sizzling and sticky and the positioning was positioned simply ten levels from the equator.

The fossils have been fashioned when a colossal flood dumped enormous quantities of sediment into the river delta. Animals residing on the ocean ground have been smothered, whereas swimming creatures have been jumbled up with vegetation and bugs from land in a muddy grave. Very low ranges of oxygen meant the buried organisms weren’t topic to speedy decay. As an alternative, micro organism slowly decomposed the stays, whereas emitting methane and ammonia, and triggered a collection of chemical reactions that finally resulted in nodules forming across the fossil nuclei.

Fig. 7._2
Fig. eight. The attention construction of the Tully monster, as seen underneath a scanning electron microscope. This association of ‘meatball’ and ‘sausage’ formed melanosomes has solely ever been seen in animals with backbones and gives proof for the Tully monster additionally being a vertebrate. 1μm equals one thousandth of a millimetre. (Thomas Clements.)

Most Tully monster fossils got here from Pit Eleven of the Peabody Coal Firm strip mine close to Essex in Illinois, positioned 105km southwest of Chicago. Nodules protect the soft-bodied invertebrates in addition to easier-to-preserve shells, fish skeletons, arthropod exoskeletons and plant leaves and twigs.

Fig. 8.
Fig. 9. Weird, elongated prey-capturing snouts are often present in fishes. The snout of this Australian ghost shark bears some similarities with the Tully monster’s clawed proboscis. (Fir0002/Flagstaffotos; http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/fdl-1.2.html.)
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10. The stalked eyes of this black dragonfish larva are each bit as alien as these of the Tully monster. (G David Johnson/Smithsonian NMNH.)
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11. Lampreys are primitive jawless fishes that might be surviving relations of the Tully monster. (Tiit Hunt/Wikimedia Commons.)

In 1966, Richardson named the ‘worm-like’ fossil in honour of its discoverer. Richardson had known as it a “monster” when he first noticed it and that description additionally made it into its Latin identify. In 1969, he co-authored a paper that concluded the Tully monster “represents an extinct and beforehand unknown phylum”. In different phrases, it was so completely different from, for instance, all recognized arthropods, molluscs, annelid worms and chordates (animals with cartilaginous skeletal rods, together with these with backbones – the vertebrates), every of that are separate animal phyla containing an enormous number of species, that it deserved to be positioned all by itself in a brand new phylum. It was “so unusual as to be a organic orphan,” wrote Richardson.

Fig. 11a
Fig. 12 Left: a lamprey clings on to its prey with a hoop of sharp enamel and makes use of a rasping tongue (within the centre of its disc) to chop by means of pores and skin and feed on physique fluids. (T Lawrence, GLFC.) Proper: the Tully monster grabbed its prey with this clawed proboscis and rasped at its sufferer’s flesh with a protracted tongue – if McCoy’s lamprey identification is appropriate. (Paul Mayer/Area Museum.)

Extra right down to earth was Merrill Foster, of Bradley College in Illinois, who in 1979 concluded that it was an “aberrant member” of the molluscs. He in contrast it with sea snails, generally known as heteropod gastropods, which are present in tropical seas the place they swim round looking for snails and soft-bodied prey to eat. Popularly generally known as ‘sea elephants’, owing to their trunk-like proboscises, heteropods arguably bear the closest resemblance to the Tully monster amongst residing animals. Nevertheless, they solely have a fossil document that goes again to the Jurassic interval, of 201 to 145mya, and Foster argued that the Tully monster was a sea snail that lived in an analogous approach to trendy heteropods, however was not their direct ancestor. “I’m regretfully conscious of the truth that I could also be eradicating a part of the rationale for the Tully Monster’s attraction,” he wrote.

He needn’t have fearful. Subsequent research introduced its identification firmly again into query. A convention was held in 1989, on the College of Camerino in Italy, the place two new papers have been offered. Bret Beall, of the Area Museum, analysed 21 anatomical characters of the Tully monster in a cladistic evaluation involving quite a lot of principally invertebrate teams. He concluded that it was closest both to the conodonts (extinct, elaborately toothed, worm-like animals) or to heteropod-like sea snails, as argued by Foster. The proof pointed both approach. “After my paper was revealed, I continued my evaluation and began to favour the chordates over the gastropods,” Beall advised me in 2014, after I began work on this characteristic. Muddying the waters additional was a cladistic evaluation, by Frederick Schram of the Scripps Establishment of Oceanography in La Jolla, California, that discovered that the Tully monster was most intently associated to at least one or different of two unrelated kinds of worm: the annelid worms (of which earthworms are the best-known instance), or the ribbon worms.

The Tully monster grew to become the official state fossil for Illinois in 1989 and its fame continued to develop. It adorned the facet of U-Haul vans and trailers, and artists made fashions and cartoons of it. There was even an elaborate hoax during which Richardson was fooled by a mischievous former colleague into considering that it nonetheless lived in a lake in Kenya.

College of Edinburgh dinosaur skilled Steve Brusatte was born and raised in Illinois – it was coal mining that introduced his household there within the first place. “It was this nice thriller I realized about as a child. It all the time caught with me that there was this considered one of a form fossil that was present in my yard, and that scientists from all over the world had come to gather and examine, and that no person knew what it was. That impressed me that there have been these enormous mysteries concerning the evolution of life that wanted to be solved,” says Brusatte.

For 1 / 4 of a century, that was how science left the Tully monster. It might be considered one of two kinds of worm, or a really uncommon sea snail, or it might even be associated to animals with backbones. Or it might be a totally new and distinctive sort of animal.

I grew to become excited by it within the 1990s, after I got here throughout an illustration imagining the way it appeared in life. One look at this alien-looking creature had me hooked. At the moment, evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould speculated in his guide, Great Life, that the traditional oceans have been stuffed with strange animal ‘experiments’ that belonged to a variety of extinct animal phyla, giving as examples the 508myr-old animals from the Burgess Shale in Canada. The ‘Cambrian Explosion’ had burst into life 542mya, spewing out distinctive physique plans like confetti, argued Gould. The animal phyla that survived the Cambrian, which ended 485mya, have been however a pale shadow of the variety that had gone earlier than. Certainly, I believed, the Tully monster was a leftover from this wondrous occasion.

It was an alluring thought, however we now know that Gould’s hypothesis was incorrect. “The entire animals that Gould wrote about can now be associated to residing phyla. A few of them are on the stem of extant teams, however hadn’t developed all of their options,” says Mark Purnell, professor of palaeobiology on the College of Leicester. “The concept that the Tully monster might belong to an historical lineage not intently associated to different animal teams is now largely discredited.” So the likelihood is that it belongs to a recognized – versus unknown – animal phylum. However which one might that be?

I approached Purnell in 2014, simply as analysis into the Tully monster was kicking again into life. Purnell and his colleague, Sarah Gabbott, had recruited Thomas Clements to review the preservation of Mazon Creek fossils. Little or no unique natural materials has survived within the Mazon Creek fossil nodules. The useless animals have been moulded in sediment, decayed and recent sediment stuffed the mould and fashioned a replica of the originals. Other than its physique form, virtually no hint of the unique animal remained. This lies on the coronary heart of the conundrum going through palaeobiologists investigating the Tully monster. Fuzzy impressions of its moulded physique components are topic to wildly completely different interpretations. There are not any clearly identifiable anatomical traits in its fossils which are distinctive to at least one phylum or one other, therefore the roadblock as to which of its competing identities is appropriate.

As Clements and the Leicester workforce investigated additional, they got interested within the Tully monster’s eyes. You would possibly anticipate that the eyes would decompose rapidly however they’ve microscopic pigments which are very sturdy within the fossil document, one thing Gabbott had been finding out amongst different Mazon Creek animals. They suspected that a number of the unique pigment had survived within the Tully monster. This was doubtlessly an important breakthrough but – right here eventually was arduous bodily proof.

The pigment melanin is contained in distinctive granular constructions known as melanosomes inside the eye. Its important job is to soak up stray mild that hits the attention to allow a transparent picture to type. Melanosomes are precious to palaeontologists as a result of, not solely are they sturdy, however in addition they type distinctive shapes and layered patterns inside the eye cells, relying on the kind of animal.

‘Meatball’ and ‘sausage’ formed melanosomes, stacked in layers, have been discovered. “Solely vertebrates have these two kinds of melanosomes layered collectively. We’re very assured the Tully monster suits inside the vertebrates. I believe it might be some kind of basal fish,” says Clements.

Clements additional factors out that, whereas it had a really uncommon anatomy, there reside fish that additionally possess bizarre options. Just like the Tully monster, the Australian ghost shark has an elongated snout, whereas the larvae of black dragonfish have their eyes projecting from lengthy stalks. The Tully monster isn’t uniquely odd in contrast with different vertebrates.

Whereas Clements was finding out the eyes, a workforce headed by Victoria McCoy of Yale College took a recent take a look at 1,200 Tully monster specimens. She grew to become excited by what had beforehand been interpreted as its intestine. In different Mazon Creek animals the intestine is darkish in color and preserved in three dimensions, whereas within the Tully monster it’s mild and flattened. Nevertheless, within the Mazon Creek hagfish Gilpichthys the notochord (a rudimentary spine) is mild and flattened too. Consequently, McCoy re-identified the intestine as a notochord – a trait solely discovered within the chordate phylum, to which the vertebrates belong.

Independently, and thru utterly completely different strategies from Clements, McCoy had reached the identical conclusion that the Tully monster was a vertebrate. She went on to determine different anatomical traits that place it inside the vertebrates, together with a mouth with enamel made from keratin, a tail fin, muscle blocks and gill pouches. A cladistic evaluation was additionally carried out by McCoy, which discovered that it was a kind of lamprey, a primitive jawless fish. Fashionable lampreys are eel-like parasites that connect their mouths with suckers to the perimeters of bigger fish, the place they devour physique fluids and rasp off bits of flesh, usually inflicting the dying of their unwilling host.

Tully monsters have been very completely different. “It was most likely an lively predator that hunted by sneaking its proboscis, which can have been expandable, near its prey and snatching them with its toothy claw. Its eyebar gave it a large sight view to purpose its clawed proboscis precisely and will have been advantageous in murky, vegetation-choked water. It put in bursts of pace with its tail and doubtless ate soft-bodied worms or small jellyfish because the enamel in its claw couldn’t crush or chew more durable prey. As an alternative, its tongue prolonged alongside its proboscis and rasped off bits of the animal trapped in its claw. We don’t suppose it was a parasite, like a lamprey, as a result of it doesn’t have a sucking disc to connect to massive prey,” says McCoy.

Earlier this 12 months, a workforce of vertebrate palaeontologists, led by Lauren Sallan of the College of Pennsylvania, roundly rejected these arguments. They argued that its ‘vertebrate’ traits have been misidentified and take subject with practically each conclusion reached by McCoy’s workforce.

“The constructions recognized by McCoy and her workforce didn’t learn to us as vertebrate. The ‘notochord’ stripe is extra seemingly a intestine, and the ‘muscle blocks’ and ‘gill pouch’ segments are too huge, blocky and should not within the appropriate place to be what they’re claimed to be,” says Sallan.

Fig. 12.
Fig. 13. Lampreys parasitize different aquatic animals, comparable to this salmon, by clinging on and feeding on physique fluids. Against this, the Tully monster is assumed to have been a free-swimming predator. (T Lawrence, GLFC.)

Nevertheless, she is extra cautious concerning the melanosome proof. There could also be invertebrates with an analogous association of melanosomes that haven’t but been studied, or it might be a convergent characteristic that re-evolved because of shared genes, she suggests.

Fig. 13.
Fig. 14. Sea lampreys exhibiting their eyes and gills. (A Miehls, GLFC.)

The likeliest different to the vertebrate identification is that it was a heteropod-like sea snail, as proposed by Foster again in 1979. Nevertheless, McCoy’s workforce reject this for quite a lot of causes to do with the fossils’ anatomy and preservation. Of their view, the proof suits the lampreys way more convincingly. The opposite doable identities, comparable to a kind of worm, or an unknown phylum, are too weakly supported by the proof to hold a lot favour amongst scientists.

For just a few temporary months final 12 months, the identification of the Tully monster appeared to have been resolved, however not. For my cash, I’m sticking to the vertebrate identification for now. Two massive research independently reached the identical conclusion and I believe the melanosome proof, specifically, is tough to problem.

It’s now for the specialists to resolve whether or not this enduring thriller can ever be solved.

In regards to the creator

James labored in media relations for the British authorities for a few years earlier than following his coronary heart and finding out palaeobiology at College Faculty London. He graduated with a first-class Grasp in Science diploma in 2002 and has since written quite a few options on the evolution of life for New Scientist and different magazines. He might be contacted at: jcodonoghue@yahoo.co.uk.

Acknowledgements

I’m grateful to Bret Beall, Steve Brusatte, Thomas Clements, Sarah Gabbott, Ceinwen Jones, Ted Lawrence, Paul Mayer, Poppy Mathews, Victoria McCoy, Catherine Ogilvie, Mark Purnell, Lauren Sallan and Rosemary Wright for his or her beneficiant assist in making ready this text.

Fig. 14.
Fig. 15. Sea lamprey exhibiting its enamel, rasping tongue, eye and gills. (T Lawrence, GLFC.)

Bibliography and additional studying

Beall, B.S. 1991. The Tully monster and a brand new method to analyzing problematica.

Clements, T., Dolocan, A., Martin, P., Purnell, M.A., Vinther, J. & Gabbott, S.E. 2016. The eyes of Tullimonstrum reveal a vertebrate affinity. Nature, 532: 500–503. doi:10.1038/nature17647.

Fig. 15.
Fig. 16. Sea lamprey exhibiting its eye and gills. (T Lawrence, GLFC.)

Conway-Morris, S. & Simonetta, A.M. (eds). In: The Early Evolution of Metazoa and The Significance of Problematic Taxa (Eds:) 271–286. Cambridge College Press.

Foster, M.W. 1979. A reappraisal of Tullimonstrum gregarium. In: Mazon Creek Fossils (Ed: Nitecki, M.H.) 269-301. Educational Press, New York.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1987-07-09/features/8702200088_1_mazon-creek-tully-monster-first-dinosaurs

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4241904/Mystery-ancient-Tully-Monster-far-solved.html

Johnson, R.G., Richardson, E.S. Jr. 1969. Pennsylvanian Invertebrates of the Mazon Creek Space, Illinois: The Morphology and Affinities of Tullimonstrum. Fieldiana Geology, 12 (eight): 119–149.

McCoy, V.E., Saupe, E.E., Lamsdell, J.C., Tarhan, L.G., McMahon, S., Lidgard, S., Mayer, P., Whalen, C.D., Soriano, C., Finney, L., Vogt, S., Clark, E.G., Anderson, R.P., Petermann, H., Locatelli E.R. & Briggs, D.E. 2016. The ‘Tully monster’ is a vertebrate. Nature 532: 496–499. doi:10.1038/nature16992.

Richardson, E.S. Jr. 1966. Wormlike Fossil from the Pennsylvanian of Illinois. Science, 151 (3706): 75–76.

Sallan, L., Giles, S., Sansom, R.S., Clarke, J.T., Johanson, Z., Sansom, I.J. & Janvier, P. 2017. The ‘Tully Monster’ shouldn’t be a vertebrate: characters, convergence and taphonomy in Palaeozoic problematic animals. Palaeontology: 1-7. doi:10.1111/pala.12282.

Schram, F.R. 1991. Cladistic evaluation of metazoan phyla and the location of fossil problematica. In: The Early Evolution of Metazoa and The Significance of Problematic Taxa (Eds: Conway-Morris, S. & Simonetta, A.M.) 35–46. Cambridge College Press.

Fig. 16.
Fig. 17. Sea lampreys exhibiting the discs that connect to their prey. (T Lawrence, GLFC.)


♦ Buy Fossils, Crystals, Tools
♦ Subscribe to Deposits
♦ Join Fossil Hunts
♦ UK Fossil Locations

Deposits Magazine

This entry was posted in Geology and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply